But you are right...why is the LA Times behaving like cosmopolitan is mind-boggling; they should be worrying about Obama and McCain if it is the election is what they are interested in...

All that "Ooooh, the Clintons and Obama...how much do they hate each other? How close will they hug, how warm are their smiles...ooooh...What did Bill meanwhen he said...? Was Obama fair...oooh."

I wish we could all be grown ups about this and acknowledge there will be people together on stages who are ticked at each other, don't like each other much etc. (Or maybe some of them do, who knows?).

But these are their jobs. They're politicians. They'll do what they must to get their party in power and keep it there not only for pure idealistic causes but because it serves their own ambitions.

To me that's a big problem.

All of this attention to her every move though....  Does anyone else remember when Saturday night live did a series of their faux commercials about a political campaign?  Anyway, the politicians had their typical back and forth sniping commercials during the campaign.  However, even after the election, the winner continued to make negative commercials about the loser.  Reminds me a lot of what continues in the press and among supporters and surrogates over this and other actions of any Clinton....  Sad.  

I know politics is a shark infested self-preservationfest.  But Richardson endorsing Obama was a bad move on his part.  As an ardent Clinton supporter, I find it completely unforgiveable.

The Clintons are human too ya know.  Certainly they had to feel some type of anger and disappointment of Richardson.