home

Diminished Media Presence at Gitmo for Tomorrow's Hearings

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9/11 defendants have hearings this week, beginning tomorrow at Guantanamo's court for military commissions -- their first hearings since May.

Reporters who are there tonight say on Twitter the number of reporters seems to have decreased by 50%. Some estimate only 25 reporters are there, and several of them are there for the first time, representing organizations such as Jesuit Weekly and the Bergen Record.

The defense lawyers complained today that the office space they were given is infested with rats, rat feces and mold and making them ill. They filed a Motion called "Mr. Mohammad's Emergency Motion to Delay the October 2012 Hearing due to Defense Offices Being Deemed Unsafe by the US Naval Hospital Guantanamo Bay due to the Presence of Hazardous Mold, Rodents, and Rodent Feces." While (naturally) the motion and responses are sealed, the Court's one sentence order denying the motion is available on the docket (choose the active case for KSM from the dropdown list and then the link for all documents at the bottom or the docket link.) [More...]

One of the big issues this week will be the government's request to prevent torture details at the trials. Not only that, they are asking the court to limit the defense attorneys' ability to discuss such treatment with their clients. And it seems like the Court is going to go along.

On Twitter, you can follow Carole Rosenberg and PBS Frontline reporter Arun Rath. Hopefully more will be tweeting as the hearings progress.

Among the media who is there and will be arguing for openness this week, in addition to the ACLU:

ABC, Inc., Associated Press, Bloomberg News, CBS Broadcasting, Inc., Fox News Network, The Miami Herald and its parent McClatchy Co., National Public Radio, The New York Times, The New Yorker, Reuters, Tribune Company, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post.

Show Trials. As the ACLU says:

“The government’s claim that it can keep from the public the defendants’ testimony about their ‘thoughts and experiences’ of torture is legally untenable and morally abhorrent,” said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU’s National Security Project and the attorney who will argue the motion Wednesday. “There is an ongoing public debate about the fairness and transparency of the Guantánamo military commissions, and if the government succeeds in imposing its desired censorship regime, the commissions will certainly not be seen as legitimate.”

< Arlen Specter, R.I.P | Lead Shrinks: Don't Let Amendment 64 Go Up in Smoke >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Showtrials by Obama regime (N/T) (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Andreas on Sun Oct 14, 2012 at 11:18:41 PM EST
    .

    Except (none / 0) (#2)
    by Jeralyn on Mon Oct 15, 2012 at 04:26:23 AM EST
    Romney would waterboard them until they drowned. Or use a firing squad to kill them before trial.

    You can say pick your poison, but Romney's by the the worst of the two.

    Parent

    I (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by lentinel on Mon Oct 15, 2012 at 08:51:45 AM EST
    would indeed say that this election is about picking one's poison.

    I applaud you for giving us details about what the Obama administration is doing regarding the rights of these defendants, and the seemingly overt attempt to limit transparency to the opaque.

    This sentence is particularly hair-raising to me, in light of the Obama administration's strenuous efforts to shield and immunize the Bush administration from prosecution:

    One of the big issues this week will be the government's request to prevent torture details at the trials. Not only that, they are asking the court to limit the defense attorneys' ability to discuss such treatment with their clients.

    I can easily see why you would be convinced that Romney is worse. I would no way encourage anyone to vote for him.

    A choice between poisons.
    Not exactly what I had been waiting for.

    Parent

    Either way you are dead (none / 0) (#4)
    by Dadler on Mon Oct 15, 2012 at 09:56:19 AM EST
    Pick your poison might be a more apt phrase.  

    Parent
    No, you are not dead either way (none / 0) (#5)
    by Jeralyn on Mon Oct 15, 2012 at 12:02:52 PM EST
    There's a big difference in who they would put on the Supreme Court and pick as Attorney General. Those alone are enough reasons not to choose Romney.

    Is (none / 0) (#6)
    by lentinel on Mon Oct 15, 2012 at 12:22:17 PM EST
    there much worse than Holder?

    Just asking.

    Ashcroft and Gonzalez I guess, but gee... couldn't we do better than Eric - we need the patriot act now more than ever- Holder?

    Parent