"Negotiations" were apparently underway between the DOJ and Mueller.  The chairman stated that Mueller will come at some point, and if necessary, he will subpoena him.

 Of course, Trump and Barr object to his testifying, what with TV cameras and all and the possibility that truth may come out. And, too, those scary nightmares Trump has had of Cohn's public testimony. The one public hearing in all of the investigation of Russia's "sweeping and systematic" interference in the 2016 election, as found by Mueller.

However, what is the deal with Mueller. Why has he not left DOJ? And, does he want to testify at all? And, in public?  It would seem that after the lies of Barr about his and his team's Report based two-years of hard work, he would want to get out pronto.  The record would indicate that he does not care much for "inaccurate reporting", what with his only utterance in two-years being a January 2019 "not accurate" reporting by Buzzfeed,  that Trump directed Cohen to lie to Congress. It would be good to finally hear his voice.

There is much to ask Mueller. Over 600 former federal prosecutors say that there is enough evidence to prosecute Trump for obstruction, if not protected by DOJ policy not to indict a sitting president.

This stunning analysis evident to anyone with a high school diploma or GED who can read a tweet or be able to watch T.V., may have eclipsed the equally disputable legal analysis reported in Volume I of the Mueller Report---no conspiracy (aka collusion, as Trump and Putin call it).

  Really, not enough evidence? There is an extensive paper trail all set up for the picking: Family members Don Jr, Jared and Campaign Chair Manafort, met at Trump Tower with agents of the Russian government with offerings to help Trump and hurt his opponent. The offering of "dirt" was a thing of value (Mueller says he could not determine the value, so apparently, it is zero).  Don jr. said he would love it. A lot to go over here.

Hope to be corrected by the testimony, but I am skeptical about Mueller.  Chairman Nadler should, as is often the practice in investigations, start with those on Mueller's team. Get what he can and move up the ladder to Mueller. And, get all the other witness and felons to testify.

"No one has been tougher on Wells Fargo than myself," Treasury official Joseph Otting says.

"You mean at the OCC? That's a low bar," Sen. Elizabeth Warren responds.

"I would disagree with that. I find that insulting, that you would make that comment."

"Good!" Warren says.

The Equality Act places LGBT persons in a protected class and prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, credit, education, and public accommodations.

Some Americans do not realize that LGBT Americans are not protected against discrimination in basic matters of life such as housing and employment. However, only twenty-one states and DC passed laws that prohibit discrimination in housing and employment. Only 20 states and DC prohibit discrimination in public accommodations. Fourteen states cover credit discrimination.

Further, the public's right to that information should be absolute, and should NOT be subject to a determination by other public officials that such information is possibly unsavory in nature, or may be embarrassing to the deceased's character and / or at odds with his or her public reputation.

Unfortunately, San Francisco city officials misled the public when they said that Mr. Adachi died suddenly of a heart attack while "out in North Beach at dinner with a friend when he began to have trouble breathing," and that "there were no signs of foul play."

In fact, the city medical examiner's report confirms that Mr. Adachi died from an overdose of cocaine and alcohol. Further, he was not out to dinner with a friend when suddenly stricken but rather, was at a friend's apartment which he had apparently arranged to use for a rendezvous with a woman who was not his wife. It was that woman who called 911 to summon emergency medical help when he became ill.

City officials further compounded matters when they initially made a concerted effort to downplay and muddy the circumstances of Mr. Adachi's tragic demise. While I understand that their motive for doing so was generally altruistic and borne out of respect for the deceased's family, they were still wrong to do so.

Not surprisingly, the police incident report was soon leaked to Bay Area media, which reported the location and initial circumstances of the incident. Amid the period of public mourning, city officials chastised the police for allowing the details of a confidential report to end up in the local headlines.

SFPD launched an internal investigation into the report's leaking, which culminated this past Friday morning in a police raid on the home and office of freelance journalist Bryan Carmody, who had received the report and other information from a confidential source and then sold it to three local Bay area TV stations.

The admittedly murky and unsettling circumstances of Jeff Adachi's death should not detract from the fact that he was a good and decent man, and that he was a very well-respected attorney and public defender. And in that respect, I can't help but think that Mr. Adachi himself would've likely been appalled by last Friday morning's police raid on Mr. Carmody's home and office in an effort to compel him to reveal his source's identity.

Unless the release of information would compromise an ongoing police investigation or pose a threat to either national security or someone's life, as I noted above the public's right to know should be considered absolute. But freedom of the press, as enshrined in our Constitution, is sacrosanct, even if we do find the behavior of individual reporters sometimes unethical or problematic.

As Cosomopolitian pointed out

Wow, Everyone Missed Varys Fully Trying to Poison Daenerys

Will the kitchen help still have access to Varys's ring, and if so what will happen.

However, the entirely of such legislation needs equal condemnation and resistance.

Simon Forman and Richard Napier were the 17th-century equivalents, prescribing ointments and other "cures" to the folk of Elizabethan England.

A decade-long project at the University of Cambridge is seeing some of their patient records digitalized - and the result is a fantastical insight into the medical world of the pre-industrial era. A time prior to Alexander Fleming and the discovery of penicillin in 1928, or Edward Jenner and the invention of the first successful vaccine (for smallpox) in 1798.

Before the use of antibiotics and vaccines became widespread, astrology, magic, and religion were the cornerstones of medicine. As the records show, Forman and Napier advised patients to wear dead pigeons as slippers and consulted angels for advice.

but's it's definitely making news

It was interesting when he scorched the FOX "opinion hosts" and no one disagreed.

This is how you make you and your argument look ridiculous.

THIS VIDEO OF JOE BIDEN HUGGING HIS WIFE AT A PHILADELPHIA RALLY IS DIVIDING OPINION

I just saw it in my liquor store and cracked up.  Then bought some.  It's pretty good.

"We like to say here that we are politically incorrect and equal-opportunity offenders," Jones says.

"A name is what you make of it."

Flavors coming soon include: MMM-Peach and Stormy's Liqueur: Passionfruit Flavored, according to Jones.

 Moreover, he responded to the brickbats from his party members who took the lead from that heavyweight Trump, who, among other things, called Amash a lightweight, with the following reasoned and legally-based thinking:

1.  They say there is no underlying crime.  In fact, there were many crimes revealed by the investigation, some of which were charged and some of which were not, but nonetheless, described in Mueller's Report.

2.  They say obstruction of justice requires an underlying crime.

3.  They imply the president should be permitted to use any means to end what he claims to be a frivolous investigation, no mater how unreasonable his claim.

In fact, the president could not have known whether every single person Mueller investigated did or did not commit any crimes.

4.  They imply "high crimes and misdemeanors" requires charges of a statutory crime or misdemeanor

In fact, "high crimes and misdemeanors" is not defined in the Constitution and does not require corresponding statutory charges. Rather, a violation of public trust and discussed by founding scholars.

Because if you think this would NOT work you are as delusional as a typical MAGAliod.

Russian documents reveal desire to sow racial discord -- and violence -- in the U.S.
The revelations come as U.S. intelligence agencies have warned of probable Russian meddling in the 2020 election.